New highway use tax is bad news for Connecticut families


For the editor:

If you’re a working-class citizen like me, your family’s budget may have been affected by soaring prices at the grocery store and at the gas pump. As we are in an inflationary spiral, caused by the unchecked borrowing and spending of politicians in Washington, and the disastrous reversal of American energy policy, governments large and small should look for creative ways to reduce price burdens. for their constituents.

In this election year, you’ll hear Connecticut Democrats on the campaign trail touting tax cuts and a 25-cent-per-gallon gas tax holiday, but what you won’t hear is that the gas tax relief never applied to diesel, even though it is diesel. it really puts inflationary pressure on our assets. What you also won’t hear is that the estimated cost of living increase per family is currently $5,200 per year, and you also won’t hear about the additional costs that they voted to tax you in the assembly session.

On April 29, Connecticut House Republicans introduced an amendment to the Connecticut Clean Air Act, which sought to repeal the Highway Use Tax (HUT). HUT, which is due to come into force on January 1, 2023, is a kilometer tax applied to trucks, scaled according to the weight of the vehicle. The amendment, which was co-offered by Republican nominee for lieutenant governor, Representative Laura Devlin (134th Assembly District), failed on a vote of 53 to 94, with only one Democrat, Rep. Jill Barry (31st Assembly District) joining Republicans. .

I’m sure you’re wondering at this point, “How is this a vote to raise prices?” It affects businesses, not my family. Ronald Reagan once said, “You can’t tax corporations. Companies do not pay taxes. He collects taxes. And that’s exactly what we’re going to see in Connecticut next year if we don’t act now to call for the repeal of the HUT.

Some Connecticut-based fuel and consumer goods distributors estimate the new tax will cost their businesses more than $7,500 per truck per year. Make no mistake, this new tax will have a direct impact on the costs you incur to get to work, feed your children and keep them warm at home this winter. Families are already reducing their weekly grocery purchases as the April 2022 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics highlights annual increases in average U.S. city prices for rice (+15%), beef (+ 16%) and eggs (+55%), to name just a few essential foods; that Democrats are intentionally adding a tax that will increase the cost of these goods is hard to fathom.

Moreover, the fact that this tax should start during the winter, when the use of heating oil (diesel) enters the high season and families struggle to pay their energy bills, makes this even more difficult to accept. A Fairfield neighbor recently shared his home heating oil delivery receipt – he paid an astounding $6.249 per gallon. To put that into perspective with our past family budgets, these current prices have increased nearly 100% since January 2022 ($3.329 per gallon) and 250% ($2.452 per gallon) since January 2021, when the Biden administration is input function. I am writing this letter in May. Can you imagine what the price will look like in the dead of winter when the state starts taxing delivery trucks carrying heating oil to families? This tax will not be absorbed by the fuel delivery companies, it will be passed on to your family. The Democrats’ decision to vote against repealing HUT is frankly cruel and shows how out of touch their party is with the communities they claim to support.

Our working families are suffering and barely making ends meet. This is not the time to impose new taxes, and it is certainly not the time to tax the transport of goods. Given that on November 15, 2021, Connecticut received $5.38 billion from the federal government for infrastructure, voting against this price-raising tax before it took effect was the right thing to do for businesses and families across the country. Connecticut. I commend House Republicans for understanding the impact of HUT on us and for their efforts to reduce transportation costs in Connecticut. I am disappointed with Democrats, especially my current State Representative and opponent, Cristin McCarthy-Vahey (133rd Assembly District). In the end, they did not deem this amendment worthy of consideration and voted against our families and in favor of increasing property prices that impact the most economically vulnerable in our community.

Michael Grant,
Fairfield, Connecticut

Grant is the Republican candidate for the 133rd District and operates a family logistics business in Stamford.

Source link


About Author

Comments are closed.